https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813 In liquor licensing, an applicant does not acquire a vested, accrued, or enforceable legitimate expectation merely by filing an application, making investments in anticipation, or relying on an earlier policy. The State may alter, vary, or withdraw the policy before grant of licence, and the controlling policy is the one in force on the date of grant. Article 14 cannot be used to compel continuation of an earlier scheme or to claim parity with irregular or illegal grants made to others. The applicants therefore had no enforceable right to insist on L-52 licences after the policy change and closure of the scheme. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813 In liquor licensing, an applicant does not acquire a vested, accrued, or enforceable legitimate expectation merely by filing an application, making investments in anticipation, or relying on an earlier policy. The State may alter, vary, or withdraw the policy before grant of licence, and the controlling policy is the one in force on the date of grant. Article 14 cannot be used to compel continuation of an earlier scheme or to claim parity with irregular or illegal grants made to others. The applicants therefore had no enforceable right to insist on L-52 licences after the policy change and closure of the scheme. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813