<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments. The Court held that the appellants did not have any legal right to the grant of licences and that the State&#039;s policy decision to stop issuing L-52 licences was valid. The Court also noted that the period for which the applications for grant of licences had been granted had expired, and therefore, no further relief could be provided to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments. The Court held that the appellants did not have any legal right to the grant of licences and that the State&#039;s policy decision to stop issuing L-52 licences was valid. The Court also noted that the period for which the applications for grant of licences had been granted had expired, and therefore, no further relief could be provided to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>