<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 479 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162805</link>
    <description>The court upheld the levy of tax at five percent under section 7(7A) for the construction of drain and culvert, determining that they do not fall under the civil works covered by section 7(7) of the Sales Tax Act. The petitioner&#039;s argument to revert to general assessment under section 5(1) after opting for the compounded rate under section 7(7A) was rejected. The court affirmed the decisions of the assessing authority and Tribunal, dismissing the revision for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 479 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162805</link>
      <description>The court upheld the levy of tax at five percent under section 7(7A) for the construction of drain and culvert, determining that they do not fall under the civil works covered by section 7(7) of the Sales Tax Act. The petitioner&#039;s argument to revert to general assessment under section 5(1) after opting for the compounded rate under section 7(7A) was rejected. The court affirmed the decisions of the assessing authority and Tribunal, dismissing the revision for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>