https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162804 The High Court examined the justification of recoveries against sureties in a series of writ petitions. It determined that the notices and sale proclamations concerning the sureties' property were not justified for years they did not stand as sureties. Referring to relevant tax laws, the court held that sureties should only be liable for the estimated tax payable for a year as assessed by the dealer. Relying on precedent, the court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the orders for recoveries against the sureties without awarding costs. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:25:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162804 The High Court examined the justification of recoveries against sureties in a series of writ petitions. It determined that the notices and sale proclamations concerning the sureties' property were not justified for years they did not stand as sureties. Referring to relevant tax laws, the court held that sureties should only be liable for the estimated tax payable for a year as assessed by the dealer. Relying on precedent, the court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the orders for recoveries against the sureties without awarding costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162804