<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162803</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessment of the JCB loader for entry tax, ruling it exigible to tax under the Act. The limitation provision did not apply due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to file a return. The court directed consideration of the claim for reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State. For the HMT 2522 Tractor, the court found it registered as a motor vehicle in Tamil Nadu and set aside the assessment orders for review. The court dismissed challenges to assessment order validity and clarified the applicability of the limitation provision. The assessing authority was directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s claims and reassess the tractor&#039;s tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162803</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessment of the JCB loader for entry tax, ruling it exigible to tax under the Act. The limitation provision did not apply due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to file a return. The court directed consideration of the claim for reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State. For the HMT 2522 Tractor, the court found it registered as a motor vehicle in Tamil Nadu and set aside the assessment orders for review. The court dismissed challenges to assessment order validity and clarified the applicability of the limitation provision. The assessing authority was directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s claims and reassess the tractor&#039;s tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>