<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 809 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162802</link>
    <description>The court determined that three milk food items manufactured by the petitioners are classified as pasteurised milk under the First Schedule of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, exempting them from tax. The court emphasized the assessing authority&#039;s duty to make reasoned decisions on tax liability and found the previous orders lacking in specific reasoning, leading to their annulment. The matter was remitted for detailed assessment by the Commissioner of Taxes, with an interim order halting tax collection until resolution. The petitioners were instructed to continue filing returns pending final determination, stressing the importance of expert opinions in evaluating tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 809 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162802</link>
      <description>The court determined that three milk food items manufactured by the petitioners are classified as pasteurised milk under the First Schedule of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, exempting them from tax. The court emphasized the assessing authority&#039;s duty to make reasoned decisions on tax liability and found the previous orders lacking in specific reasoning, leading to their annulment. The matter was remitted for detailed assessment by the Commissioner of Taxes, with an interim order halting tax collection until resolution. The petitioners were instructed to continue filing returns pending final determination, stressing the importance of expert opinions in evaluating tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>