<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 538 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162799</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the Tribunal to entertain an appeal beyond the limitation period, clarifying that mandamus cannot override statutory provisions. The court distinguished a previous order where a similar petition was allowed, emphasizing it did not set a legal precedent. It concluded that mandamus cannot be granted against statutory provisions, even with costs imposed, and dismissed the petition as legally untenable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 538 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162799</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the Tribunal to entertain an appeal beyond the limitation period, clarifying that mandamus cannot override statutory provisions. The court distinguished a previous order where a similar petition was allowed, emphasizing it did not set a legal precedent. It concluded that mandamus cannot be granted against statutory provisions, even with costs imposed, and dismissed the petition as legally untenable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>