<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 821 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162794</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act could be levied under section 7-A(2) only by the assessing authority. A Deputy Commissioner, even when exercising revisional or reassessment powers under section 14(4) read with section 14(4-C), does not acquire the jurisdiction of an assessing authority for section 7-A(2). The penalty power under section 7-A(2) is distinct from the penalty mechanism under section 14(8), and the absence of an appellate remedy against a Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order under section 7-A supports that construction. On that basis, penalty orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner were without jurisdiction and beyond competence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 821 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162794</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act could be levied under section 7-A(2) only by the assessing authority. A Deputy Commissioner, even when exercising revisional or reassessment powers under section 14(4) read with section 14(4-C), does not acquire the jurisdiction of an assessing authority for section 7-A(2). The penalty power under section 7-A(2) is distinct from the penalty mechanism under section 14(8), and the absence of an appellate remedy against a Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order under section 7-A supports that construction. On that basis, penalty orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner were without jurisdiction and beyond competence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>