https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162786 A revisional order that omits discussion of the material facts, applicable statutory provisions, and the parties' submissions is unsustainable because it lacks the reasoning necessary for judicial scrutiny. The Court found the impugned order cryptic and unsupported by cogent reasons, and held that a revisional authority must record consideration of the facts, governing law, rival contentions, and reasons for accepting or rejecting them. As the controversy could not be decided on merits in writ jurisdiction on such a deficient order, the matter was remanded for a fresh decision on merits after considering all questions raised by the petitioner. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:05:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162786 A revisional order that omits discussion of the material facts, applicable statutory provisions, and the parties' submissions is unsustainable because it lacks the reasoning necessary for judicial scrutiny. The Court found the impugned order cryptic and unsupported by cogent reasons, and held that a revisional authority must record consideration of the facts, governing law, rival contentions, and reasons for accepting or rejecting them. As the controversy could not be decided on merits in writ jurisdiction on such a deficient order, the matter was remanded for a fresh decision on merits after considering all questions raised by the petitioner. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162786