<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 548 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162785</link>
    <description>The court held that the Bihar Entry Tax Act, 1993, as adopted and amended by Jharkhand, did not satisfy the requirements under Articles 301 and 304(b) of the Constitution. The amendments were declared ultra vires due to the lack of Presidential assent. Consequently, the State of Jharkhand could not enforce the provisions of the Act or its amendments, and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:53:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 548 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162785</link>
      <description>The court held that the Bihar Entry Tax Act, 1993, as adopted and amended by Jharkhand, did not satisfy the requirements under Articles 301 and 304(b) of the Constitution. The amendments were declared ultra vires due to the lack of Presidential assent. Consequently, the State of Jharkhand could not enforce the provisions of the Act or its amendments, and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>