<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 609 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the seizure of scrapped steel by the Commercial Tax Officer under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act was unjustified. The petitioner, transporting goods within West Bengal, had provided sufficient documentation, rendering the seizure invalid. The penalty paid for the release of seized goods was refunded to the petitioner within one month of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 609 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the seizure of scrapped steel by the Commercial Tax Officer under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act was unjustified. The petitioner, transporting goods within West Bengal, had provided sufficient documentation, rendering the seizure invalid. The penalty paid for the release of seized goods was refunded to the petitioner within one month of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>