<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 547 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162777</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption under G.O. Ms. No. 1194 for iron and steel scrap used in the manufacture of M.S. ingots was available only when the notification&#039;s conditions, including the required declaration and the specified class of buyers, were strictly satisfied, so the exemption could not be claimed on unproved facts. A set-off under G.O. Ms. No. 774 was likewise confined to cases where tax had already been levied and collected at the earlier stage on the relevant scrap or intermediate products, and the claimant had to prove that factual basis. The governing principle is strict compliance with notification conditions and proof by the person claiming the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 547 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162777</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption under G.O. Ms. No. 1194 for iron and steel scrap used in the manufacture of M.S. ingots was available only when the notification&#039;s conditions, including the required declaration and the specified class of buyers, were strictly satisfied, so the exemption could not be claimed on unproved facts. A set-off under G.O. Ms. No. 774 was likewise confined to cases where tax had already been levied and collected at the earlier stage on the relevant scrap or intermediate products, and the claimant had to prove that factual basis. The governing principle is strict compliance with notification conditions and proof by the person claiming the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>