<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 573 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162775</link>
    <description>A revisional court will not disturb a Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that purchases were made for an ex-U.P. principal and that the goods were despatched outside the State when that finding is supported by contemporaneous records such as books of account, 6R and 9R entries, stock register and satti bahi. The court also held that reliance on an adverse enquiry was unwarranted where the enquiry was conducted after a long delay and was not fairly confronted to the dealer, with no opportunity for cross-examination. On that record, the transactions were treated as inter-State purchases and the deletion of tax was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 573 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162775</link>
      <description>A revisional court will not disturb a Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that purchases were made for an ex-U.P. principal and that the goods were despatched outside the State when that finding is supported by contemporaneous records such as books of account, 6R and 9R entries, stock register and satti bahi. The court also held that reliance on an adverse enquiry was unwarranted where the enquiry was conducted after a long delay and was not fairly confronted to the dealer, with no opportunity for cross-examination. On that record, the transactions were treated as inter-State purchases and the deletion of tax was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>