<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 573 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</link>
    <description>A revenue clarification issued by the Commercial Taxes authority was treated as executive in character and binding on the department while it remained in force. The principle applied was that such departmental clarifications may guide assessment, but any withdrawal or change can operate only prospectively and cannot be used to prejudice an assessment already governed by the earlier position. On that basis, the later clarification could not justify retrospective reclassification of compacting machinery or an enhanced tax liability for the relevant assessment year, and the assessment order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 573 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</link>
      <description>A revenue clarification issued by the Commercial Taxes authority was treated as executive in character and binding on the department while it remained in force. The principle applied was that such departmental clarifications may guide assessment, but any withdrawal or change can operate only prospectively and cannot be used to prejudice an assessment already governed by the earlier position. On that basis, the later clarification could not justify retrospective reclassification of compacting machinery or an enhanced tax liability for the relevant assessment year, and the assessment order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>