<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 573 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling that the clarification issued by the tax authorities would have only prospective application. Consequently, the impugned assessment order was quashed and set aside. The writ appeal was dismissed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 573 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling that the clarification issued by the tax authorities would have only prospective application. Consequently, the impugned assessment order was quashed and set aside. The writ appeal was dismissed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>