https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162770 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of proper communication of decisions affecting their rights. It held that uncommunicated orders cannot be enforced, directing the respondents not to act on the cancellation of the final eligibility certificate until properly communicated to the petitioner. The court safeguarded the petitioner's rights under the certificate, ensuring procedural fairness and the right to challenge the decision once properly communicated. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:05:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162770 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of proper communication of decisions affecting their rights. It held that uncommunicated orders cannot be enforced, directing the respondents not to act on the cancellation of the final eligibility certificate until properly communicated to the petitioner. The court safeguarded the petitioner's rights under the certificate, ensuring procedural fairness and the right to challenge the decision once properly communicated. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162770