https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244992 The Commission found the Bengal Chemist and Druggists Association (BCDA) guilty of anti-competitive practices, violating Sections 3(3)(a), 3(3)(b), and 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. BCDA was involved in price-fixing and controlling drug supply, restricting competition and harming consumers. The Commission held BCDA's office bearers and executive committee members liable under Section 27 of the Act, despite their argument that Section 48 did not apply. Penalties were imposed on BCDA and its members, with orders to cease anti-competitive practices and file undertakings within 30 days, and to deposit penalties within 60 days based on financial statements. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244992 The Commission found the Bengal Chemist and Druggists Association (BCDA) guilty of anti-competitive practices, violating Sections 3(3)(a), 3(3)(b), and 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. BCDA was involved in price-fixing and controlling drug supply, restricting competition and harming consumers. The Commission held BCDA's office bearers and executive committee members liable under Section 27 of the Act, despite their argument that Section 48 did not apply. Penalties were imposed on BCDA and its members, with orders to cease anti-competitive practices and file undertakings within 30 days, and to deposit penalties within 60 days based on financial statements. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244992