<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue&#039;s Stance on Textile Dealer as Manufacturer for Duty but Not Cenvat Credit Refund is Inconsistent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17716</link>
    <description>Refund - the arguments of the Revenue that only for payment of duty, a dealer of textile goods will be considered as a manufacturer and not for refund of Cenvat credit is not consistent and not in conformity with the policy of the Government - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:04:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue&#039;s Stance on Textile Dealer as Manufacturer for Duty but Not Cenvat Credit Refund is Inconsistent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17716</link>
      <description>Refund - the arguments of the Revenue that only for payment of duty, a dealer of textile goods will be considered as a manufacturer and not for refund of Cenvat credit is not consistent and not in conformity with the policy of the Government - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:04:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>