<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 426 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remitting the disallowance under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the requirement for the AO to prove the actual incurring of expenses for earning tax-exempt income before applying Rule 8D for disallowance. The issue of adding the disallowed amount under section 14A while computing book profit was deemed infructuous due to the remittance of the main issue for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 426 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remitting the disallowance under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the requirement for the AO to prove the actual incurring of expenses for earning tax-exempt income before applying Rule 8D for disallowance. The issue of adding the disallowed amount under section 14A while computing book profit was deemed infructuous due to the remittance of the main issue for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>