<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 753 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on both issues. The disallowance of reimbursement of medical expenses to Directors was deemed allowable as business expenses, and the interest disallowance on borrowed funds was deleted due to the lack of evidence showing a connection with interest-free advances. The judgment stressed the importance of concrete evidence for disallowances and upheld the principle of commercial expediency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 753 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on both issues. The disallowance of reimbursement of medical expenses to Directors was deemed allowable as business expenses, and the interest disallowance on borrowed funds was deleted due to the lack of evidence showing a connection with interest-free advances. The judgment stressed the importance of concrete evidence for disallowances and upheld the principle of commercial expediency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>