<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 418 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244963</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of full disclosure in settlement proceedings and distinguishing them from adjudication processes. The petitioners&#039; failure to demonstrate a genuine effort to come clean about their duty liability led to the dismissal of their settlement application. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Commission&#039;s order and dismissed the petition with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 418 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244963</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of full disclosure in settlement proceedings and distinguishing them from adjudication processes. The petitioners&#039; failure to demonstrate a genuine effort to come clean about their duty liability led to the dismissal of their settlement application. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Commission&#039;s order and dismissed the petition with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>