<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 417 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244962</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to require a 50% pre-deposit instead of granting full waiver to the petitioner. Emphasizing the importance of undue financial hardship and revenue protection, the Court extended the time for the pre-deposit by one month. The judgment dismissed the writ petition without costs, leaving the case&#039;s merits open for future review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 417 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244962</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to require a 50% pre-deposit instead of granting full waiver to the petitioner. Emphasizing the importance of undue financial hardship and revenue protection, the Court extended the time for the pre-deposit by one month. The judgment dismissed the writ petition without costs, leaving the case&#039;s merits open for future review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>