https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244960 The judgment held that cenvat credit was generally admissible to manufacturer recipients, except in one case involving cash payments. Some appellants had their appeals allowed, while others were rejected based on admissibility of credit and penalties. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence proving awareness of irregularities by manufacturer recipients and the applicability of penalties even before the amendment of Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244960 The judgment held that cenvat credit was generally admissible to manufacturer recipients, except in one case involving cash payments. Some appellants had their appeals allowed, while others were rejected based on admissibility of credit and penalties. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence proving awareness of irregularities by manufacturer recipients and the applicability of penalties even before the amendment of Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244960