<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 414 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter for de novo adjudication, waiving pre-deposit, following applications for a stay of proceedings to realize assessed liability. The impugned order confirmed Central Excise duty demand, penalties, and interest, based on alleged suppression of production and duty evasion. Search operations revealed incriminating evidence, leading to a show cause notice. The appellant faced delays in obtaining and analyzing seized computer data, prompting the Tribunal to emphasize the need for integrated analysis. Discrepancies in records necessitated further adjudication, resulting in the setting aside of the initial order for fresh adjudication within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 414 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter for de novo adjudication, waiving pre-deposit, following applications for a stay of proceedings to realize assessed liability. The impugned order confirmed Central Excise duty demand, penalties, and interest, based on alleged suppression of production and duty evasion. Search operations revealed incriminating evidence, leading to a show cause notice. The appellant faced delays in obtaining and analyzing seized computer data, prompting the Tribunal to emphasize the need for integrated analysis. Discrepancies in records necessitated further adjudication, resulting in the setting aside of the initial order for fresh adjudication within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>