https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244957 The Tribunal held that the appellants had satisfied the requirements under Rule 7(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. They were found not responsible for investigating the legitimacy of transactions beyond their immediate supplier. As the appellants had received and used the materials in their manufacturing process, paid for them legitimately, and provided sufficient evidence of receipt and use, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244957 The Tribunal held that the appellants had satisfied the requirements under Rule 7(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. They were found not responsible for investigating the legitimacy of transactions beyond their immediate supplier. As the appellants had received and used the materials in their manufacturing process, paid for them legitimately, and provided sufficient evidence of receipt and use, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244957