https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162753 Writ interference was unavailable where the interim stay on recovery had already ceased by operation of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, and the relief sought would have overridden the statutory scheme. The Court noted that it could not pass any interim or final order contrary to the second proviso to section 22(5), because the complaint arose from the statute itself rather than from any act of the Tribunal or the respondents. A mandamus for expeditious disposal of the pending appeal was also declined, as there was no material on the Tribunal's docket position or on the feasibility or necessity of such a direction. en-us Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:44:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162753 Writ interference was unavailable where the interim stay on recovery had already ceased by operation of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, and the relief sought would have overridden the statutory scheme. The Court noted that it could not pass any interim or final order contrary to the second proviso to section 22(5), because the complaint arose from the statute itself rather than from any act of the Tribunal or the respondents. A mandamus for expeditious disposal of the pending appeal was also declined, as there was no material on the Tribunal's docket position or on the feasibility or necessity of such a direction. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162753