<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 518 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162736</link>
    <description>Non-consideration of a ground specifically raised in the memorandum of appeal and argued before the Tribunal constitutes a patent mistake on the face of the record and can be corrected by rectification under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The omission is distinct from a claim that a ground was considered but wrongly decided, because it does not require fresh fact-finding or lengthy argument. The Tribunal is duty-bound to deal with all grounds properly placed before it. The rectification application was therefore allowed, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider the omitted ground after hearing both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 518 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162736</link>
      <description>Non-consideration of a ground specifically raised in the memorandum of appeal and argued before the Tribunal constitutes a patent mistake on the face of the record and can be corrected by rectification under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The omission is distinct from a claim that a ground was considered but wrongly decided, because it does not require fresh fact-finding or lengthy argument. The Tribunal is duty-bound to deal with all grounds properly placed before it. The rectification application was therefore allowed, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider the omitted ground after hearing both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>