<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 556 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162726</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption under the notification depended on two conditions: the industrial unit had to own or acquire land for the unit, and it had to apply for financial support from a regular financial institution before the 1 January 2000 cut-off. The recorded materials showed the lease deed was executed only on 28 October 2000 and the financial assistance application was made on 10 February 2000. The recital in the later lease deed about earlier oral delivery of possession was not accepted as sufficient proof of acquisition before the cut-off, so the statutory conditions were not satisfied and exemption was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 556 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162726</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption under the notification depended on two conditions: the industrial unit had to own or acquire land for the unit, and it had to apply for financial support from a regular financial institution before the 1 January 2000 cut-off. The recorded materials showed the lease deed was executed only on 28 October 2000 and the financial assistance application was made on 10 February 2000. The recital in the later lease deed about earlier oral delivery of possession was not accepted as sufficient proof of acquisition before the cut-off, so the statutory conditions were not satisfied and exemption was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>