<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 613 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162719</link>
    <description>Suo motu revision under section 20(1) of the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956 is supervisory and can be used only where the completed assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. A mere belief that turnover was understated is insufficient; the revisional authority must rely on materials already on record and show how the original assessment involved an error of law or jurisdiction. Reopening based only on an inspector&#039;s report, without authentic supporting material or independent application of mind, is based on conjecture and extraneous direction. The revisional order and the consequential reassessment orders were therefore held unsustainable and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 613 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162719</link>
      <description>Suo motu revision under section 20(1) of the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956 is supervisory and can be used only where the completed assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. A mere belief that turnover was understated is insufficient; the revisional authority must rely on materials already on record and show how the original assessment involved an error of law or jurisdiction. Reopening based only on an inspector&#039;s report, without authentic supporting material or independent application of mind, is based on conjecture and extraneous direction. The revisional order and the consequential reassessment orders were therefore held unsustainable and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>