https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244952 The applicant's claim for availing CENVAT credit based on invoices not in their name was rejected by the appellate authority due to discrepancies in duty paying documents. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount within four weeks, with a waiver of pre-deposit of penalties until the appeal's disposal. Compliance and reporting obligations were emphasized, stressing the need for accurate documentation and adherence to tax regulations to avoid penalties and ensure procedural compliance. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:05:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244952 The applicant's claim for availing CENVAT credit based on invoices not in their name was rejected by the appellate authority due to discrepancies in duty paying documents. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount within four weeks, with a waiver of pre-deposit of penalties until the appeal's disposal. Compliance and reporting obligations were emphasized, stressing the need for accurate documentation and adherence to tax regulations to avoid penalties and ensure procedural compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244952