<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, holding that gains from Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and independently carried out share transactions should be classified as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Income from Business or Profession.&quot; The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, directing that the gains be assessed under the head of &quot;Capital Gains.&quot; The assessees&#039; appeals were fully successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, holding that gains from Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and independently carried out share transactions should be classified as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Income from Business or Profession.&quot; The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, directing that the gains be assessed under the head of &quot;Capital Gains.&quot; The assessees&#039; appeals were fully successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>