<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, rejecting the disallowance of provision for outstanding expenses and upholding the inclusion of unutilized modvat credit in the closing stock. However, the Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for determination of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation allowance based on a previous order. The decision was based on a thorough analysis and interpretation of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, rejecting the disallowance of provision for outstanding expenses and upholding the inclusion of unutilized modvat credit in the closing stock. However, the Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for determination of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation allowance based on a previous order. The decision was based on a thorough analysis and interpretation of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>