<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 387 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244932</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that MAT credit should be granted before charging interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent and reiterated that the benefit of MAT credit should be confirmed for the relevant period. As a result, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with the Court answering the questions against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 387 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244932</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that MAT credit should be granted before charging interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent and reiterated that the benefit of MAT credit should be confirmed for the relevant period. As a result, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with the Court answering the questions against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>