<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 385 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244930</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration on the deductibility of provisions for mediclaim and warranty expenses, as well as the treatment of doubtful debts for MAT income computation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, directing a fresh assessment within six months, considering legal precedents and amendments to tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 385 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244930</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration on the deductibility of provisions for mediclaim and warranty expenses, as well as the treatment of doubtful debts for MAT income computation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, directing a fresh assessment within six months, considering legal precedents and amendments to tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>