https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244926 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the appellant to predeposit 25% of the duty amount but extended the timeline for payment. Emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution, the Court instructed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within three months of the predeposit. The dispute centered on whether the items in question qualified for exemption from excise duty as parts of wind operated electricity generators. The Court clarified that the exemption applied to specific items, not the entire system, and granted the appellant the opportunity to deposit 10% initially and the remaining 15% within a specified timeframe. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244926 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the appellant to predeposit 25% of the duty amount but extended the timeline for payment. Emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution, the Court instructed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within three months of the predeposit. The dispute centered on whether the items in question qualified for exemption from excise duty as parts of wind operated electricity generators. The Court clarified that the exemption applied to specific items, not the entire system, and granted the appellant the opportunity to deposit 10% initially and the remaining 15% within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244926