<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244924</link>
    <description>Sieving and repacking of LBU 30 and LBU 60 under Chapter 25 was treated as not amounting to manufacture. On that basis, the goods were not regarded as exempted goods, and the clearances were treated as inputs cleared as such. The operative liability was confined to reversal of the CENVAT credit availed on those inputs, namely the 4% SAD credit, rather than payment of 5%/10% of the value under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244924</link>
      <description>Sieving and repacking of LBU 30 and LBU 60 under Chapter 25 was treated as not amounting to manufacture. On that basis, the goods were not regarded as exempted goods, and the clearances were treated as inputs cleared as such. The operative liability was confined to reversal of the CENVAT credit availed on those inputs, namely the 4% SAD credit, rather than payment of 5%/10% of the value under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>