<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244922</link>
    <description>Deficiencies in Registry file handling, absence of order sheets in connected folders, and irregular maintenance of Vakalatnamas and cause list entries were identified. Non-compliance with the earlier mandamus on proper filing of Vakalatnamas was treated as contempt, and the record suggested administrative lapses needing explanation. The Registrar was directed to file a report within one month explaining why appropriate orders should not be passed against the erring officials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244922</link>
      <description>Deficiencies in Registry file handling, absence of order sheets in connected folders, and irregular maintenance of Vakalatnamas and cause list entries were identified. Non-compliance with the earlier mandamus on proper filing of Vakalatnamas was treated as contempt, and the record suggested administrative lapses needing explanation. The Registrar was directed to file a report within one month explaining why appropriate orders should not be passed against the erring officials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>