<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 570 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162691</link>
    <description>On a limited remand, the assessing authority is confined to the precise subject-matter remitted by the appellate order and must act consistently with findings that have already attained finality. Where the first appellate authority had expressly upheld rejection of the books of account and remitted only verification of the C forms, that adverse finding could not be reopened in later proceedings because it was not challenged and remained conclusive between the parties. The assessing authority therefore lacked jurisdiction to re-adjudicate the settled issue, and the higher court upheld the view that the concluded appellate finding could not be reagitated after partial remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 570 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162691</link>
      <description>On a limited remand, the assessing authority is confined to the precise subject-matter remitted by the appellate order and must act consistently with findings that have already attained finality. Where the first appellate authority had expressly upheld rejection of the books of account and remitted only verification of the C forms, that adverse finding could not be reopened in later proceedings because it was not challenged and remained conclusive between the parties. The assessing authority therefore lacked jurisdiction to re-adjudicate the settled issue, and the higher court upheld the view that the concluded appellate finding could not be reagitated after partial remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>