<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162673</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court considered whether solvent extraction of oil from soya bean seeds amounts to manufacture for purchase tax purposes and whether the seeds and de-oiled cake are different commodities under section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. It held that a process that transforms purchased taxable goods into commercially distinct products satisfies the manufacturing condition, even if no entirely new article is created in a narrow sense. Applying the commercial identity test, the court treated soya bean seeds and the resultant oil and de-oiled cake as different commodities, so the purchase tax liability was attracted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162673</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court considered whether solvent extraction of oil from soya bean seeds amounts to manufacture for purchase tax purposes and whether the seeds and de-oiled cake are different commodities under section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. It held that a process that transforms purchased taxable goods into commercially distinct products satisfies the manufacturing condition, even if no entirely new article is created in a narrow sense. Applying the commercial identity test, the court treated soya bean seeds and the resultant oil and de-oiled cake as different commodities, so the purchase tax liability was attracted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>