<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 640 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162661</link>
    <description>The court held that the appeal fee was not part of the assessed tax, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The court directed the authorities to pay interest at nine per cent on the refunded amounts from the date of application till payment, in accordance with statutory provisions. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, with both judges concurring on the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to interest on the refunded amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:10:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 640 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162661</link>
      <description>The court held that the appeal fee was not part of the assessed tax, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The court directed the authorities to pay interest at nine per cent on the refunded amounts from the date of application till payment, in accordance with statutory provisions. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, with both judges concurring on the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to interest on the refunded amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>