<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 540 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162653</link>
    <description>Deduction of tax at source under section 27(1)(a) of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 depended on the deducting entity satisfying the statutory description of a company under Government control. The petitioner&#039;s objection that this precondition was not met remained uncontroverted by affidavit, and the supply and billing relationship relied on by the State did not justify the deduction in the manner attempted. On that basis, respondent no. 3 was not entitled to deduct tax at source from the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 540 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162653</link>
      <description>Deduction of tax at source under section 27(1)(a) of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 depended on the deducting entity satisfying the statutory description of a company under Government control. The petitioner&#039;s objection that this precondition was not met remained uncontroverted by affidavit, and the supply and billing relationship relied on by the State did not justify the deduction in the manner attempted. On that basis, respondent no. 3 was not entitled to deduct tax at source from the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>