<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 538 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162644</link>
    <description>A rejection of an assessee&#039;s application under rule 50 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules was appealable under section 19 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the decisive test is the substance of the decision, not its label. The court treated the endorsement as an order since it affected the assessee&#039;s rights and obligations, including the correct determination of tax liability. Describing the communication as an endorsement did not prevent appealability where its practical effect was determinative. The appeal was therefore maintainable, and the matter was remitted for consideration on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 538 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162644</link>
      <description>A rejection of an assessee&#039;s application under rule 50 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules was appealable under section 19 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the decisive test is the substance of the decision, not its label. The court treated the endorsement as an order since it affected the assessee&#039;s rights and obligations, including the correct determination of tax liability. Describing the communication as an endorsement did not prevent appealability where its practical effect was determinative. The appeal was therefore maintainable, and the matter was remitted for consideration on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>