https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162631 HC held that the writ petition could be entertained despite an alternative statutory reference remedy because the core jurisdictional and fairness issues had not been properly decided and further delay would not serve justice. It also found that the authorities had not examined whether the later order was passed in the correct statutory framework, whether a second exercise of revisional power was permissible, whether fresh notice was required after remand, and whether the dealer had been effectively confronted with material obtained from other authorities. The preliminary objection was overruled, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2014 18:02:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162631 HC held that the writ petition could be entertained despite an alternative statutory reference remedy because the core jurisdictional and fairness issues had not been properly decided and further delay would not serve justice. It also found that the authorities had not examined whether the later order was passed in the correct statutory framework, whether a second exercise of revisional power was permissible, whether fresh notice was required after remand, and whether the dealer had been effectively confronted with material obtained from other authorities. The preliminary objection was overruled, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162631