<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 453 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162621</link>
    <description>A sales tax incentive granted under a governmental scheme could not be denied on a narrow reading of the eligibility certificate, because the certificate was only evidence of entitlement and not the source of the exemption itself. Once the Industries Department clarified and amended the certificate to recognise processing of cashew nut and cashew kernel as eligible activities, the commercial tax authorities could not withdraw the benefit merely because the original certificate did not expressly mention cashew kernel. The revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner remained entitled to exemption on the turnover from cashew kernel processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 453 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162621</link>
      <description>A sales tax incentive granted under a governmental scheme could not be denied on a narrow reading of the eligibility certificate, because the certificate was only evidence of entitlement and not the source of the exemption itself. Once the Industries Department clarified and amended the certificate to recognise processing of cashew nut and cashew kernel as eligible activities, the commercial tax authorities could not withdraw the benefit merely because the original certificate did not expressly mention cashew kernel. The revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner remained entitled to exemption on the turnover from cashew kernel processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>