<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 604 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162613</link>
    <description>A delegated exemption notification under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held to align with the 1993-98 industrial policy because the policy&#039;s references to &quot;sales tax exemption&quot; and &quot;sales tax deferral&quot; were confined to tax on sales turnover. The policy did not extend to distinct levies under the Act such as purchase tax, and the statutory definition of &quot;tax&quot; could not broaden that policy language. The notification exempting tax on goods manufactured and sold by a new industrial unit therefore implemented, rather than contradicted, the policy, and exemption from purchase tax on raw materials purchased from unregistered dealers was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:32:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 604 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162613</link>
      <description>A delegated exemption notification under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held to align with the 1993-98 industrial policy because the policy&#039;s references to &quot;sales tax exemption&quot; and &quot;sales tax deferral&quot; were confined to tax on sales turnover. The policy did not extend to distinct levies under the Act such as purchase tax, and the statutory definition of &quot;tax&quot; could not broaden that policy language. The notification exempting tax on goods manufactured and sold by a new industrial unit therefore implemented, rather than contradicted, the policy, and exemption from purchase tax on raw materials purchased from unregistered dealers was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>