https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244914 The High Court set aside the impugned order of the Central Information Commission in a case involving a complaint under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act seeking penalty against a CPIO for failure to provide information. The Court directed the Commission to dispose of the complaint within four months, emphasizing that the Commission should decide complaints on merits rather than directing the CPIO to provide information, except in cases of entertaining a second appeal under Section 19. The judgment clarified the distinct procedures and remedies under Sections 18 and 19 of the Act. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244914 The High Court set aside the impugned order of the Central Information Commission in a case involving a complaint under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act seeking penalty against a CPIO for failure to provide information. The Court directed the Commission to dispose of the complaint within four months, emphasizing that the Commission should decide complaints on merits rather than directing the CPIO to provide information, except in cases of entertaining a second appeal under Section 19. The judgment clarified the distinct procedures and remedies under Sections 18 and 19 of the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244914