https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244912 The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal challenging the order of the CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer's actions were against the law, facts, and natural justice with mala-fide intention. It was determined that the time granted to the assessee to produce necessary documents was insufficient, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation with adequate opportunity provided to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244912 The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal challenging the order of the CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer's actions were against the law, facts, and natural justice with mala-fide intention. It was determined that the time granted to the assessee to produce necessary documents was insufficient, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation with adequate opportunity provided to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244912