<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 366 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting both additions related to outstanding labour charges. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence to support disallowances, rejecting mere suspicion as a basis for additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 366 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting both additions related to outstanding labour charges. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence to support disallowances, rejecting mere suspicion as a basis for additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>