<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing specific adjustments and remands for various issues while upholding some disallowances with directions for future deductions. The decision emphasized the importance of functional comparability, the necessity of working capital adjustments, and the procedural limits of AO&#039;s powers post-DRP directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing specific adjustments and remands for various issues while upholding some disallowances with directions for future deductions. The decision emphasized the importance of functional comparability, the necessity of working capital adjustments, and the procedural limits of AO&#039;s powers post-DRP directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>