<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 356 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the assessment of capital gains on the sale of a property. The appellant, acting as an agent without consideration, contested the valuation and indexation used in the assessment. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s role as an agent was supported by registered documents and the actual owner&#039;s statement, leading to the acceptance of the appellant&#039;s primary argument. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant could not be treated as the owner of the property sold, thereby overturning the lower appellate decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 356 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the assessment of capital gains on the sale of a property. The appellant, acting as an agent without consideration, contested the valuation and indexation used in the assessment. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s role as an agent was supported by registered documents and the actual owner&#039;s statement, leading to the acceptance of the appellant&#039;s primary argument. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant could not be treated as the owner of the property sold, thereby overturning the lower appellate decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>