<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 624 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162604</link>
    <description>Under section 37 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, suo motu rectification had to be completed within three years from the end of the financial year in which the assessment or order was made. A notice issued within time did not extend or validate an order passed after that limitation period, because the statutory language was plain and had to be applied strictly. The rectification order was therefore time-barred and without authority of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 624 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162604</link>
      <description>Under section 37 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, suo motu rectification had to be completed within three years from the end of the financial year in which the assessment or order was made. A notice issued within time did not extend or validate an order passed after that limitation period, because the statutory language was plain and had to be applied strictly. The rectification order was therefore time-barred and without authority of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>