<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 803 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162601</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court held that the Kara Samadhana Scheme could not be read to require a dealer to admit liability on part of the turnover, because that condition did not appear in the operative provisions and could not be added from the preamble. The Court also held that the Scheme applied only to taxes, interest and penalty involved in appeals pending on the stipulated date. Accordingly, waiver was unavailable for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, when no appeal was pending, but was available for 1997-98 and 1998-99, where appeals were pending and the Scheme&#039;s conditions were otherwise met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:33:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 803 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162601</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court held that the Kara Samadhana Scheme could not be read to require a dealer to admit liability on part of the turnover, because that condition did not appear in the operative provisions and could not be added from the preamble. The Court also held that the Scheme applied only to taxes, interest and penalty involved in appeals pending on the stipulated date. Accordingly, waiver was unavailable for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, when no appeal was pending, but was available for 1997-98 and 1998-99, where appeals were pending and the Scheme&#039;s conditions were otherwise met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>